International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions & Author Guideline
    • Accepted Papers
    • Editorial Policy
    • Editorial Board Members
    • Reviewers
    • Propose a Special Issue
    • Printed Hard copy
    • Subscription
    • Membership
    • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
    • Digital Archiving
    • Contact
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Publication Charge
  • Submission
  • Testimonials
  • Announcements
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. 2022 - Volume 12 [Issue 11]
  4. Original Research Article

Submit Manuscript


Subscription



  • Home Page
  • Author Guidelines
  • Editorial Board Member
  • Editorial Policy
  • Propose a Special Issue
  • Membership

Assessment of Quality Parameters in Different Clones of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)

  • Sadras Bhavana
  • M. Vijay Kumar
  • G. S. Madhu Bindu
  • D. V. V. Reddy
  • K. Chiranjeev

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, Page 3524-3530
DOI: 10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i111400
Published: 2 November 2022

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • References
  • Statistics
  • Share

Abstract


The analysis of the quality indices in sugarcane plays a vital role in the process of refining sugarcane breeding, cultivation, and production management. The present investigation was conducted at Agricultural Research Station, Basanthpur-Mamidigi, Medak Dist., Telangana during 2016-2017 to study the quality parameters of twelve sugarcane clones. The field experiment was conducted with 12 varieties in randomized block design replicated thrice. The observations made from the study stated that varieties varied significantly for the quality parameters. Among the varieties, Co 8014, has recorded the highest sucrose and Commercial Cane Sugar (CCS) percent followed by Co 86032, Co C 671 and Co 95020. The variety, 97 R 129 has recorded the lowest sucrose and CCS, followed by 97 R 401, 85 R186, Co 99006 and 83 R 23. The Brix values were high for Co 86032 and low for 97 R 401. Similarly, Co 99006 and Co C 92061 showed high and low values, respectively for purity percentage. Further, it could be attributed that the clones Co 86032 and Co 95020 recorded the highest sugar and cane yields. Conversely, the clones 83 R 23 and 85 R 186 recorded the lowest sugar and cane yields. Higher cane yield, sucrose and CCS percent in varieties had resulted in significantly higher sugar yields.


Keywords:
  • Sugarcane
  • sucrose content
  • CCS
  • Brix value
  • purity percent
  • etc
  • Full Article - PDF
  • Review History

How to Cite

Bhavana, S., Kumar, M. V., Bindu, G. S. M., Reddy, D. V. V., & Chiranjeev, K. (2022). Assessment of Quality Parameters in Different Clones of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 12(11), 3524-3530. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i111400
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver

References

Berding N, Brotherton GA, Skinner JC. Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for analysis of sugarcane from clonal evaluation trials: I. fibrated cane. Crop Sciences. 1991;31:1017.

Staunton S, Donald D, Pope G. Estimating sugarcane composition using ternary growth relationships. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Technol, Mackay, Australia. 2011;33.

Ghosh AM, Balakrishnan M. Pilot demonstration of sugarcane juice ultrafiltration in an Indian sugar factory. Journal of Food Engineering. 2003 58(2):143–150.

Sadras Bhavana M, Vijay Kumar GS, Madhu Bindu DVV, Reddy. Screening for root and yield characteristics under rainfed conditions in sugarcane clones (Saccharum officinarum L.). Bulletin of environmental Pharmacology and life sciences. 2017;6:466-474.

Meade GP, Chen JPG. Cane Sugar handbook, 10th edition. A Wiley inter science publication, John Wiley and sons, New York; 1977.

Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods of agricultural workers. Ind. Council Agric. Res. New Delhi. 1978;361.

Hemaprabha G, Swapna S, Lavanya DL, Sajitha B, Venkataramana S. Evaluation of drought tolerance potential of elite genotypes and progenies of Sugarcane. Sugar Tech. 2012;15 (1): 9-16.

Sanghera GS, Tyagi V, Kumar R, Thind KS. Selection Indices for earliness, yield and quality traits in Sugarcane for Sub tropical region of India. International Conference on "Crop Productivity and Sustainability - Shaping the future. 2014;31-34.

Kadam UA, More SM, Kadam BS, Nale VN. Growth, Yield and Quality performance of promising sugarcane genotypes under pre-seasonal condition in Maharashtra. Ind. Sugar. 2007;23-28.

Thangavelu S, Chiranjivi Rao K. Juice purity as a tool in identifying high sucrose sugarcane clones and it’s associations with other traits. Indian Sugar. 2003;53(9):703-708.

Kulkarni SR, Garkar RM, Gaikwad DD, Pol KM. Evaluation of early maturing sugar genotypes for yield and quality. Co-orperative Sugar. 2010;41(9):57-61.

Mukunda Rao Ch, Raja Rajeswari V, Naidu NV, Ramakrishna Rao S. Study on post-harvest deterioration in sugarcane. 24th meeting of sugarcane research and development workers of Andhra Pradesh held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad. 2010; 61-63.

Rakkiyappan P, Thangavelu S, Radhamani R. Juice chemical components and technological characteristics of some promising mid late sugarcane cloves. Sugar Tech. 2003;5(4):319- 322.

Sanghera GS, Kumar R, Tyagi V, Rupindu Pal Singh, Kashyap L, Singh O, Thind KS, Kumar B. Co Pb08217-A promising Mid Maturing Variety of Sugarcane for Punjab. The J. of Pl. Sci. Res. 2016;32(2):165- 171.

Naidu NV, Rajabapa Rao V, Raja Rajeswari V, Charumathi M, Paul Kumar BNVSR, Rosaiah B. 97A85- An early maturing promising pre-release sugarcane clone suitable for Andhra Pradesh. SISSTA. 2007;1-6.
  • Abstract View: 14 times
    PDF Download: 4 times

Download Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Telegram
Make a Submission / Login
Information
  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians
Current Issue
  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo


© Copyright 2010-Till Date, International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. All rights reserved.